Abuse Update:

Abuse Update:

People continue to send me screenshots of a man I have blocked, along with posts and comments from those supporting or participating in the same behaviour, whom I have also blocked.

I understand that not everyone will agree with me, my decisions, or the work I do, and that's absolutely okay.

However, there is a difference between constructive criticism and personal attacks. Healthy communities thrive on discussion, accountability, and respectful disagreement. They do not benefit from insults, rumours, intimidation, harassment, stalking, or attempts to provoke conflict.

I have seen claims suggesting that certain individuals were blocked simply for disagreeing with me. I hold evidence that demonstrates a different sequence of events. The individuals concerned were blocked following behaviour that I considered abusive, hostile, or repeatedly targeted towards me. The decision was based on conduct and boundaries, not on disagreement or differences of opinion.

Evidence matters. I retain evidence to support the statements I make and decisions I take. Where allegations have been made against me, I have yet to see evidence that substantiates many of those claims. Disagreement is not the issue; abusive behaviour, harassment, stalking, and repeated boundary violations are.

I am not interested in debating private evidence publicly. Those who need access to that information, including relevant organisations or authorities, can be provided with it where appropriate.

For transparency, the following individuals are not welcome within my communities, projects, groups, or platforms and remain blocked from my personal and professional spaces:

• Sarah Teasdale

• David Haji Abbott

• Jackie Steen

• Stella Rogers

These decisions were made following incidents that I considered incompatible with the standards, values, and boundaries I expect within my communities. I retain evidence relating to those decisions and stand by them. However, I will not be discussing individual matters publicly or engaging in online disputes.

My focus remains on supporting people, advocating for accessibility and inclusion, and helping to create spaces where people can participate respectfully and safely.

People are entitled to their opinions of me. What I ask is that opinions are based on facts, not assumptions, gossip, personal attacks, misinformation, or repeated attempts to target individuals who have clearly established boundaries.

For those concerned, I am aware of the content being shared and have retained relevant evidence where appropriate. I will continue to document behaviour that crosses the line into harassment, stalking, intimidation, or targeted abuse while choosing not to engage in hostility or retaliation.

My time and energy are better spent supporting the community, creating positive change, and helping those who genuinely need support.

I hope others will choose to do the same.

Sarah Wingfield

Independent Disability Advocate

KawaiiDollDecora.uk

#StopHarassment

#StopStalking

#BoundariesMatter

#ChooseRespect

#CommunitySupportThis 

Alt Text:

Square advocacy poster in white, black, purple, and pink. Large bold text at the top reads, "WARNING ⚠️ ABUSERS CONTINUE." The poster explains that the author has blocked individuals involved in abusive behaviour but continues to receive screenshots of posts about them. Sections address harassment, stalking, intimidation, rumours, and attempts to provoke conflict, while emphasising evidence, boundaries, documentation, and personal safety. The right-hand side promotes kindness, respect, inclusion, positive change, and refusing to engage in online drama. A banner at the bottom reads, "Boundaries are not hate. They are protection. Respect is a choice. Choose better." The poster is signed by Sarah Wingfield, Independent Disability Advocate, and includes community, safety, wellbeing, and documentation icons.